View Single Post
Old 06-16-2006, 02:38 AM   #17 (permalink)
hyperRealGurl hyperRealGurl is offline
Specktra Alumni
Specktra Socialite
 
hyperRealGurl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
My Mood:
iTrader: (0)
hyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond reputehyperRealGurl has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks: 1,524
Thanked 1,284 Times in 604 Posts


 
Quote:
Originally Posted by lara
The key thing is that panda eyes have little or no winging on the outer sides of the eyes. It's almost straight up on the outside eyes, curving in on the crease and rising higher on the inside corner. It's based heavily on 1920's good-time girl eyes, where all the depth of colour was kept on the inside 3rd.

hyperRealGurl posted a face on the FOTD forum that's close, but technically a charcoal eye (her depth of colour is on the outside 3rd and has a lot of winging), but flip the upper lid around and it would be perfect.

(you get asked a lot for panda eyes if you ever start doing a lot of runway make-up, hence noting the difference between charcoal eyes and panda eyes - it's one of those very set-in-stone make-up looks that never changes. )

Man i knew i did it wrong, after i posted the pics up i went back to read this post again and somewhere along the line i missed the whole not lining the waterline part and the tightline part. Gheeez lol oh well i tried

Reply With Quote