View Single Post
Old 08-29-2006, 04:29 AM   #21 (permalink)
caffn8me caffn8me is offline
Specktra Senior
Addicted
 
caffn8me's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: London & Oxford, UK
My Mood:
iTrader: (0)
caffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond reputecaffn8me has a reputation beyond repute
Thanks: 1,001
Thanked 2,291 Times in 798 Posts


 
Quote:
Originally Posted by bellaetoile
you're a minor, and if they suspected you had commited some sort of crime, they couldn't arrest you, because there are clear guidelines regarding parent/guardian presence.
They certainly can arrest someone under the age of 16. The requirement is that once detained the store must advise a parent or guardian and the store is not permitted to present the detainee with a Civil Demand or Statement Form without a parent guardian present. You can read this in the Memorandum Statement I previously mentioned - Paragraphs 6.4 (b)(i)-(ii)

A quick search of the ACLU website shows that it does protect those under 18 years old from discrimination - see this case, another interesting one and another and this. It's interesting that in three of these cases, young people were discriminated against because of the way they dressed. All these cases are against schools but as that's the environment in which young people are most likely to face discrimination, that's hardly surprising. The principles will apply to discrimination in other situations.

__________________
Sarah - Flying M·A·Caholic
Last edited by caffn8me : 08-29-2006 at 04:32 AM.
Reply With Quote
The Following 3 Users Say Thank You to caffn8me For This Useful Post: