View Single Post
Old 10-30-2007, 02:39 AM   #18 (permalink)
Twinkle_Twinkle Twinkle_Twinkle is offline
** Little Star **
Valued Member
 
Twinkle_Twinkle's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
iTrader: (6)
Twinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant futureTwinkle_Twinkle has a brilliant future
Thanks: 660
Thanked 1,259 Times in 603 Posts


 
Re: Of Beauty Discussion
Quote:
Originally Posted by BunnyBunnyBunny View Post
I personally think it's gorgeous. It's so unique. It's like an artist's interpretation of the collection, and an image inspired by the collection. That is why our managers and higher ups always tell us to definitely immediately tell the customer how the products are intended to be used, since obviously the visual is NOT how it is ideally worn daily. =P
I don't mean to pick and fuss, and the pic is "artistic" but what is the point of a promo pick that doesn't at the very least, employ the products of the new collection? I think about the Danse of Flastronic ladies, and sure, they both had pastel/metalic lines and blots all over their faces, and 99% of the populaion wouldn't choose that look, but they were also wearing the featured products, MSF's, pigments, shadows, lipsticks, etc. And then the collection is named "Of Beauty" and what I am seeing, is not cosmetically beautiful, in the least.

Reply With Quote