View Single Post
Old 12-16-2007, 08:57 PM   #62 (permalink)
moonrevel moonrevel is offline
mischief managed
Contributing Member
 
moonrevel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh, PA
My Mood:
iTrader: (0)
moonrevel is a glorious beacon of lightmoonrevel is a glorious beacon of lightmoonrevel is a glorious beacon of lightmoonrevel is a glorious beacon of lightmoonrevel is a glorious beacon of lightmoonrevel is a glorious beacon of lightmoonrevel is a glorious beacon of light
Thanks: 9
Thanked 193 Times in 104 Posts


 
Re: Teaser information on upcoming collections for 2008!
Quote:
Originally Posted by Winthrop44 View Post
Someone on MUA posted that it is too flexible to be useful for lining...I assume y'all would disagree with that?
I can see why someone would say that. This is a very fine and rather flexible brush, so it's definitely a question of personal preference. I have a dreadfully shaky hand for liquid/gel lining for some reason, and I cannot line the upper lashline with any precision with a brush like the #212 or the #266 to save my life. The #210 is very forgiving for people like me who are unsteady and don't want a really thick line. It lays down color easily and evenly.

I have a similar Sephora brush that has even fewer fibers that are a bit longer and more flexible, and that one I think is too floppy for Fluidlines (I use it for mixing glitter with Eyeliner Mixing Medium), but the #210 is just right.

Reply With Quote
The Following 6 Users Say Thank You to moonrevel For This Useful Post: