View Single Post
Old 01-18-2008, 11:09 AM   #9 (permalink)
athena123 athena123 is offline
Specktra Senior
Contributing Member
 
athena123's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: SoCal
My Mood:
iTrader: (3)
athena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud ofathena123 has much to be proud of
Thanks: 302
Thanked 498 Times in 206 Posts


 
Re: Sunscreen Issues / Problems
More information than you probably wanted to know. I'm slightly concerned that this site doesn't seem to think that ANY chemical barriers are sound. This site also expresses a lot of concerns about micronized use of minerals, but who wants to put a heavy, occlusive white cream on their face that looks like a lifeguard's nose? Nevertheless, a great place to start your research and draw your own conclusions.
More Healthy Suntanning, Best Sunblockers, Suntan Vitamins, Skin Cancer and Chemical Sunscreens

Sun screens are a very controversial topic within the FDA as well. Because of the FDA, the term "sunblock" isn't supposed to be allowed, since nothing can truly BLOCK UVA/UVB rays, although physical screens like Titanium and Zinc do deflect. They're also trying to come up with a rating system that will more accuratel y reflect protection from UVA rays, which is a lot more complicated than UVB.

FDA proposes sunblock testinganother forum-another forum-another forumThe Washington Times, America's Newspaper

Very dry reading, Q&A from the FDA website: Questions and Answers on the 2007 Sunscreen Proposed Rule

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to athena123 For This Useful Post: