Specktra.net MAC Makeup › Forums › Cosmetic Topics › Beauty of Color › Make Up For Ever Hd Makeup on WOC
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Make Up For Ever Hd Makeup on WOC - Page 8

post #211 of 222
I'm am nc 40 I use 123. I tried 153 140 127 128. 153 too orange and a little dark. 127 too light 128 weird undertone. 123 is darker and more yellow than 140 on me. 140 is peachy undertone. 127 too light 123 is darker. 123 is lighter and less orange on me than 153 :3 hth. Can see swatches here http://karlasugar.net/2008/08/mufe-hd-foundation/
post #212 of 222
I use MUFE 173! Love it!
post #213 of 222

I think its the best foundation out there! never have I matched so perfectly! at MAC I'm an nw 45-nw47 .. 

mufe hd im 180n :)

I use this foundation in most of my tutorials because it looks amazing on hd camera!

post #214 of 222
I have oily skin which mufe should I purchase? The matte or face & body.
post #215 of 222
I don't think you want Face & Body if you have oily skin. It's a really dewy type of finish. I love it, but I have dry skin. From what I've heard, it's given people with oily skin some problems. I think you'll be better off with just about any of their other foundations. Probably try the Mat Velvet first.
post #216 of 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by MzBrownBeauty View Post

I have oily skin which mufe should I purchase? The matte or face & body.

Mat velvet is full coverage and works well with oily skin and face and body is light to medium coverage which isn't as longwearing on us with oily skin, but its nice for a makeup no makeup your skin but better look
post #217 of 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by dominichulinda View Post

I'm going to get the smashbox HD foundation ...to have a lighter version of an HD foundation, because MUFE is tooooooooo much for my skin...:/...even the MA was telling me.

smashbox is amazingly light weight ..check it out.
I adore my smashbox hd foundation. Extremely light weight, blend able and looks like skin. I am a foundation fanatic so I want to try mufe but smashbox is worth buying.
post #218 of 222

post #219 of 222

Hi, newb here. I finally managed to get ahold of MUFE HD Foundation 175 (I'm an NC50) and the powder (used before) in the UK. Paid a LOT for it!

aaaaannnnnndd

 

Ummmm not 100% sure if it's worth the money yet. Then again, I put it on top of a crap primer (Laura Mercier, doesn't work for me at all) in a rush, and in these photos I only put the tiniest layer on, though I usually prefer more coverage. Since I was just testing, I didn't want to waste. Will try it again properly tomorrow and re-evaluate.

 

So, having had it for about 10 minutes and used a single pump for a very sheer layer, I'd score on....

 

*Colour (match to NC50) - 8/10 - looks like second skin, but is definitely a bit lighter than Matchmaster 8.0, which is the foundation I used to use (which was also too dark... I need a MUFE 174.5 or a MAC 7.8!!!) I will try to mix MUFE with MM or get a sample of 177 and mix with 175 to see if I can improve the colour match.

*Texture - 9/10 - fantastic. Feels like... nothing!

*Longevity - ?/10 unknown, first time using, just got it

 

... 7.5/10. Loses 1 mark for being so expensive; and the powder packaging is messy.

Pics or it didn't happen:

 

In natural light:

 

AppleMark

 

In spotlight:

 

AppleMark

 

This was sort of pointless because I put such a tiny amount on. But love the fact it's dewy without fix+ or anything else on it. Anyway, will re-evaluate.

 

XX

post #220 of 222
Hello everybody! I went to sephora to try out the kat von d lock it foundation....(didn't have a match for me) and walked out with the MUFE HD. This isn't the first time I tried it so I'm hoping ill like it better this go around. I did get matched to 177 this time, the first time I went with 175. I like this color a bit better I must but I still feel it needs to be a touch lighter (maybe mixed with 175?). So there are a couple things i hate about the foundation one is that is creates sort of a lighter cast over your face in flash photos, two when it oxidizes I feel like it gets darker on me, and Three i have super duper oily skin so Even after setting this a couple hours later I'm shiny in my t zone.... The things that make it worth while tho are its coverage(medium build able
natural finish) and it has a lot less transfer.
post #221 of 222
Quote:
Originally Posted by chynacuppycake View Post

Hello everybody! I went to sephora to try out the kat von d lock it foundation....(didn't have a match for me) and walked out with the MUFE HD. This isn't the first time I tried it so I'm hoping ill like it better this go around. I did get matched to 177 this time, the first time I went with 175. I like this color a bit better I must but I still feel it needs to be a touch lighter (maybe mixed with 175?). So there are a couple things i hate about the foundation one is that is creates sort of a lighter cast over your face in flash photos, two when it oxidizes I feel like it gets darker on me, and Three i have super duper oily skin so Even after setting this a couple hours later I'm shiny in my t zone.... The things that make it worth while tho are its coverage(medium build able
natural finish) and it has a lot less transfer.

What kind of primer are you using under the foundation? I've heard from some of the more oiler members here that Monostat Chafing Gel works wonders in keeping the oil away.

post #222 of 222
Tried it with an oil free moisturizer and lately I have started using the Monistat again but after about an hour I'm oily...super oily. I have been hearing good things about milk of magnesia as a primer. Have you tried it?
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Beauty of Color
Specktra.net MAC Makeup › Forums › Cosmetic Topics › Beauty of Color › Make Up For Ever Hd Makeup on WOC