Specktra.net MAC Makeup › Welcome to Specktra Community! › MAC Chat › Color Collections › Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II - Page 5

post #121 of 268
11/18/08 at 2:31am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

I am not totally impressed about Aretha Franklin. It's nice that its a real diva, a true icon, great singer, inspiration etc.. but I just can't see where they will be going with this collection.. though it probably will be nice (its MAC)

I think if Amy winehouse wasn't so messed she could be a front runner.. to me (her minus the drama, drugs etc) is icon status.
would have also liked......... Tori Amos, Mariah, uhhhh a tribute to Billie, Ella, Dinah.. or other old jazz singers. That would be classic.
Reply
Reply
post #122 of 268
11/18/08 at 2:45am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

I see alot of airbrushing coming.

Why Aretha?? Why not Tina. She's got so much spunk and edge!
Reply
Reply
post #123 of 268
11/18/08 at 2:55am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by BunnyBunnyBunny View Post
I see alot of airbrushing coming.

Why Aretha?? Why not Tina. She's got so much spunk and edge!
I agree. Totally. Tina Turner would have been better IMO! I am not dissing on Aretha Franklin at all I just think MAC missed the mark that's all. If the makeup is awesome I'll buy it regardless.
Reply
Reply
post #124 of 268
11/18/08 at 3:03am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacegirl2007 View Post
see...i cant even imagine what an aretha collection would be like. does she wear makeup? i hear names like tina turner, dolly parton, cher, etc. and hell yeah, i can totally imagine it. but aretha? notsomuch.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TISH1127 View Post
I would have guessed Patti Labelle or Tina Turner as far as makeup over Aretha Franklin...But what do I know....
ditto. i cant imagine her all makeup-ey

Quote:
Originally Posted by spacegirl2007 View Post
see...i cant even imagine what an aretha collection would be like. does she wear makeup? i hear names like tina turner, dolly parton, cher, etc. and hell yeah, i can totally imagine it. but aretha? notsomuch.
Quote:
Originally Posted by TISH1127 View Post
I will accept all the hate mail too...But Lord knows I am not invisioning what this collection is gonna be like if it's AF
OMG! Tish you make me laugh like a crazy person. I love reading your posts. and yes, again I agree with you. remember the weird hairdo she was sporting last year at some award show?
She's an Icon in the music world, but damn, MAC picks the most out there people.
Reply
Reply
post #125 of 268
11/18/08 at 3:06am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Susanne View Post
I am very loyal. I will accept nearly any Icon

BTW - today you can sell me everything you want
Ok, exception: Amy Winehouse is not applicable as an icon IMO
Reply
Reply
post #126 of 268
11/18/08 at 4:16am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbella View Post
I'm still pissed that it isn't Prince. Or the "Artist Formerly Know As Prince". Either would have been fine. He is an icon, he wears makeup and he could totally do a collection:

Raspberry Beret l/s
Darling Nicky Beauty Powder (for that special glow)
Purple Rain e/s
Pop Life l/g
Little Red Corvette l/s
Erotic City p/p

I'm still bummed. They could have called it "The Cosmetic Line Formerly Known As MAC". That would have been awesome.
Where have u been all my life? I would DIE. I love Prince! And that is such a cute idea....!!!!
Reply
Reply
post #127 of 268
11/18/08 at 7:37am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Honestly I don't know who Aretha Franklin is but I just wiki her.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sanayhs View Post
I would be all over a Bach collection. Srsly.
Me too, except that he's a man; but Franz List would be delicious.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Susanne View Post
Ok, exception: Amy Winehouse is not applicable as an icon IMO
of her.
Reply
Reply
post #128 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:03pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

OMG, I would love love love a Prince collection!!!
Reply
Reply
post #129 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:12pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

A Prince collection would be AWESOME!!
Reply
Reply
post #130 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:15pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Don't Jehovah's Witnesses have something against makeup and vanity? If anything, I'm sure the Prince of now wouldn't agree to it.

Besides, if we're going for men in makeup, it should be Bowie. He was a pioneer, even for Prince I'm sure.
Reply
Reply
post #131 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:20pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by j_absinthe View Post
Don't Jehovah's Witnesses have something against makeup and vanity? If anything, I'm sure the Prince of now wouldn't agree to it.

Besides, if we're going for men in makeup, it should be Bowie. He was a pioneer, even for Prince I'm sure.
ITA I think a Bowie icon collection would be amazing!
Reply
Reply
post #132 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:22pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by lsperry View Post
She wears makeup......from the beginning of her career to now! I am so super excited ...... a WOC icon.....and she's near my skintone....my head is twirling with the possibilities....I may have to buy back-ups and double back-ups....YEEHAW!!!
There's a difference between an iconic artist who just so happens to wear makeup, and an artist who has become iconic for not only they're talent, but what they've presented aesthetically to the world. Diana Ross made sense because, despite her recent clown like appearance, she's got a definitive visual aesthetic.
Reply
Reply
post #133 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:22pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by j_absinthe View Post
Don't Jehovah's Witnesses have something against makeup and vanity? If anything, I'm sure the Prince of now wouldn't agree to it.

Besides, if we're going for men in makeup, it should be Bowie. He was a pioneer, even for Prince I'm sure.
it would be great, but knowing how Iman has her own cosmetics line, i doubt Bowie would agree to do an icon collection with mac
Reply
Reply
post #134 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:24pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

I totally agree that would have been awesome
Reply
Reply
post #135 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:25pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Michelle Obama !!!!!
Reply
Reply
post #136 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:27pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by j_absinthe View Post
There's a difference between an iconic artist who just so happens to wear makeup, and an artist who has become iconic for not only they're talent, but what they've presented aesthetically to the world. Diana Ross made sense because, despite her recent clown like appearance, she's got a definitive visual aesthetic.
then how can you explain Aretha ? lady has talent when it comes to music but the other part idk.
Reply
Reply
post #137 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:28pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

^... Read my post again there. I think I explained it pretty well.

>_>

By the way, Iman sucked the cool out of Bowie. They're both gorgeous, but now they seem really boring.
Reply
Reply
post #138 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:30pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by panther27 View Post
Hell yes!
I'll be the third person in your
Reply
Reply
post #139 of 268
11/18/08 at 10:35pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaturdayStevens View Post
I'll be the third person in your
Yayyyyy
Reply
Reply
post #140 of 268
11/19/08 at 2:58am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbella View Post
I'm still pissed that it isn't Prince. Or the "Artist Formerly Know As Prince". Either would have been fine. He is an icon, he wears makeup and he could totally do a collection:

Raspberry Beret l/s
Darling Nicky Beauty Powder (for that special glow)
Purple Rain e/s
Pop Life l/g
Little Red Corvette l/s
Erotic City p/p

I'm still bummed. They could have called it "The Cosmetic Line Formerly Known As MAC". That would have been awesome.
My dear rbella, I'm afraid I must politely (or impolitely, as the case may be), disagree with you.

*clears throat*

FUCK. PRINCE.

Joe. My. God.: Prince Comes Out (As Anti-Gay)

After that I'm pretty confident MAC would never, will never, have anything to do with him. MAC loves them some gays.
Reply
Reply
post #141 of 268
11/19/08 at 3:26am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Prince is honestly one of the gayest men ever in the history of humanity. What straight guy loves paisley that much?

I told my mom that Aretha is going to have her own MAC collection and she was like "What??? I'll totally buy all of it." We saw her on an old episode of Emeril today and she looked like a hot mess (thats why she said "what???") but we love her!


They MUST have a l/s or l/g called "Pink Cadillac"! That would be AWESOME!
Reply
Reply
post #142 of 268
11/19/08 at 7:58am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaturdayStevens View Post
I'll be the third person in your
Woooooooo!
Reply
Reply
post #143 of 268
11/19/08 at 8:29am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaturdayStevens View Post
Prince is honestly one of the gayest men ever in the history of humanity. What straight guy loves paisley that much?
True! Prince just rubs me the wrong way.
Reply
Reply
post #144 of 268
11/19/08 at 1:07pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by Randy Rose View Post
FUCK. PRINCE.
NO. YOU. DIN'T.

He is gay, he knows it, Saturday Stevens knows, you know it and Joe knows it. Pppffftt.

Did you see his love scene in "Purple Rain"? No straight man would be that damn awkward with Appolonia's tig 'ole bitties.

You know I love me some Randy Rose, but don't make me break out my gloves.
Reply
Reply
post #145 of 268
11/19/08 at 5:05pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

I haven't heard (or read) tig ol' bitties in FOREVER!


This pic is on google images, labeled as "the gayest Prince picture ever"It DEFINITELY is! Basically he shouldn't be throwing stones in his purple glass house.

And who-the-eff has a crucifix hanging on their shower wall?
Reply
Reply
post #146 of 268
11/19/08 at 7:13pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

^^^Ahahahahah!!! I think I just threw up in my mouth a little bit. That's awesome!
Reply
Reply
post #147 of 268
11/19/08 at 8:23pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by SaturdayStevens View Post
I haven't heard (or read) tig ol' bitties in FOREVER!


This pic is on google images, labeled as "the gayest Prince picture ever"It DEFINITELY is! Basically he shouldn't be throwing stones in his purple glass house.

And who-the-eff has a crucifix hanging on their shower wall?
You've never seen the cover to the 'Sexuality' single then.

Regardless of Prince's point of views, no matter how disturbing they may seem, he will always be the shit artistically. He's a legend, even if he may be a religious fanatic now.
Reply
Reply
post #148 of 268
11/19/08 at 8:29pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

First off, Rbella, ur freaking hilarious! I have missed u so damn much

Second off, I dont know why prince said that about gay people... However I would pick up his tiny ass, take him to my bedroom and do unthinkables to him. hes h-o-t

And, no. Im not being sarcastic or joking around. dead serious
Reply
Reply
post #149 of 268
11/19/08 at 10:22pm

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by CantAffordMAC View Post
First off, Rbella, ur freaking hilarious! I have missed u so damn much

Second off, I dont know why prince said that about gay people... However I would pick up his tiny ass, take him to my bedroom and do unthinkables to him. hes h-o-t

And, no. Im not being sarcastic or joking around. dead serious

You silly thing.
Reply
Reply
post #150 of 268
11/20/08 at 12:29am

Re: Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II

Quote:
Originally Posted by j_absinthe View Post
You've never seen the cover to the 'Sexuality' single then.
I don't think I have. But if I did its been a really long time. I was REALLY into Prince a couple years ago. (NOT sexually)


Quote:
Originally Posted by j_absinthe View Post
Regardless of Prince's point of views, no matter how disturbing they may seem, he will always be the shit artistically. He's a legend, even if he may be a religious fanatic now.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Color Collections
Specktra.net MAC Makeup › Welcome to Specktra Community! › MAC Chat › Color Collections › Mac Cosmetics 2009 Icon Speculation Part II