Specktra.net MAC Makeup › Welcome to Specktra Community! › MAC Chat › Color Collections › MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:

MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion - Page 18

post #511 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:04pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
Great, then we will go from the too much MAC category to the too much waistline category.

Here is my high-tech new graphic. Can anyone figure it out?
Reply
Reply
post #512 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:06pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
Great, then we will go from the too much MAC category to the too much waistline category.

Here is my high-tech new graphic. Can anyone figure it out?


Well.. low fat cookies then? Some apples or cereals?
Reply
Reply
post #513 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:07pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
NOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO not my Hamster
Reply
Reply
post #514 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:09pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

It's not a hamster. It's a lemming. Perfect, no? lol

See:

NO LEMMING ZONE


LEMMING ALLOWED
Reply
Reply
post #515 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:10pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
Great, then we will go from the too much MAC category to the too much waistline category.

Here is my high-tech new graphic. Can anyone figure it out?
OMG! lolololololololol!!!!!!!!
Reply
Reply
post #516 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:11pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Girl I just peed a little from laughing so hard.
Reply
Reply
post #517 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:13pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

FYI, the lemming is a free-range graphic. Feel free to use it when needed.
Reply
Reply
post #518 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:15pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
FYI, the lemming is a free-range graphic. Feel free to use it when needed.
What a nice subtle hint!
Reply
Reply
post #519 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:16pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
FYI, the lemming is a free-range graphic. Feel free to use it when needed.
Damn I wish I had more signature space. Your skills are just too much
Reply
Reply
post #520 of 6040
1/23/09 at 7:25pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Here is a tweaked version:



Reply
Reply
post #521 of 6040
1/23/09 at 8:29pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Lemmings are so cute! Great job MAC_Whore!
Reply
Reply
post #522 of 6040
1/23/09 at 8:36pm
Thread Starter 

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by rbella View Post
Uh-oh, dreamer. What to do now?????????

Moxy doesn't like Petticoat or So Ceylon, Campor and I do, Shadowy doesn't like the BBR. I kinda feel sorry for you right now. Can you get to a MAC store and swatch any. Or, look at the swatch threads here and see what you think.

Petticoat is quite pinkish on me, Blonde is very much a highlight for me, Light Flush is the best thing I've ever owned, but it isn't available (might try the clearance bin). People are swearing by redhead, but I didn't care for it. Maybe you should wait for this next round and see if they fit your needs. Keep in mind you could also by a mineralized blush instead. Those are amazing and have much more pigmentation.

Sorry this is becoming confusing...
To make it more confusing...

I really like Petticoat and Light Flush. I wanted to skip Blonde from BBR. My MA told me today Blonde would be much nicer than Petticoat

I want the lighter MSF from Sugar Sweet now, some of the Grand Duos and still just two from BBR... We will see which ones
Reply
Reply
post #523 of 6040
1/23/09 at 8:48pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

The lemming pic is just too cute. Love it!

Also loving the new pics for the sugar sweet collection. My wish list now includes all the shadesticks and the darker MSF. I hope this one works out, then it will be my very first MSF and shade sticks. Is it bad to buy it just because it looks so pretty? If the color of the name is super cute and some type of yummy dessert, it will for sure be mine.
Reply
Reply
post #524 of 6040
1/23/09 at 8:51pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by cupcake123 View Post
Is it bad to buy it just because it looks so pretty? If the color of the name is super cute...
Heehee dark side just got more members

Pretty+a super cute name =

formula that always works here
Reply
Reply
post #525 of 6040
1/23/09 at 8:55pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moxy View Post
Heehee dark side just got more members

Pretty+a super cute name =

formula that always works here
Me too! I can't resist a cute name.
Reply
Reply
post #526 of 6040
1/23/09 at 9:09pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Moxy View Post
Heehee dark side just got more members

Pretty+a super cute name =

formula that always works here
Okay, I admit it, even though just a beginner,
Reply
Reply
post #527 of 6040
1/23/09 at 9:33pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

I always have lemmings for pink! eventhough that pink e/s looks exactly as the the Ungaro one, I get lemmings. I hope, hope, hope it will have a better formula, though! the Ungaro one I have to scrape off to get some colour on my brushes..
Reply
Reply
post #528 of 6040
1/23/09 at 11:14pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

I am looking forward to the pink eyeshadow. This will be my first mac eyeshadow..lol...arent i behind on the times.
Reply
Reply
post #529 of 6040
1/23/09 at 11:39pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by miss_primer View Post
I am looking forward to the pink eyeshadow. This will be my first mac eyeshadow..lol...arent i behind on the times.
You have to start sometime! Watch out though....once you start you won't be able to stop!
Reply
Reply
post #530 of 6040
1/23/09 at 11:48pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by MACLovin View Post
Furthermore, I can't believe there are no more lemon jolly ranchers. WTF is up with that? i had to go check our candy jar here at work just to be sure, but nope! no lemon ones. i liked those, how long have they been gone? does anyone remember the cinnamon ones in stick form they used to make?
speaking of cinnamon, i'm mad that both trident and altoids got rid of my favorite cinnamon products. trident got rid of their regular cinnamon gum (now they only have cinnamon whitening) and altoids got rid of the cinnamon breath strips. i loved those two!!! i actually emailed both companies to find out wtf was going on!

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
My first thought when I saw those tri-glasses is that they were fakes. They do look kind of like a fake, don't they?
no kidding! they look just like alot of the fake glosses already circulating out there. they look like the tubes from the first couture collection which i didn't like at all. they look nothing like any of the other tubes mac has come out with-all of which are round tubes, not those fugly square shit!
Reply
Reply
post #531 of 6040
1/23/09 at 11:49pm

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by coachkitten View Post
You have to start sometime! Watch out though....once you start you won't be able to stop!
AMEN to that! ^
Reply
Reply
post #532 of 6040
1/24/09 at 2:05am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by dreamer246 View Post
Aww, a hug for you!

You used the BBR ones for highlighting? I thought they were pigmented enough to be used as blushes, except maybe the Redhead one.
They're all pigmented enough to be used as blushes on paler skin - that's exactly how I used my redhead tonight!

Quote:
Originally Posted by capmorlovesmac View Post


I hope there is a seat on the "buying less bench" available because even though I started with MAC not so long ago I think my collection with items I use and will use only needs to be completed with unique items from now on.
So I will try to make my lists shorter and strike everything from the list what is not unique enough.

Like in this collection the Cakeshop Shadestick looks a bit like Greenstroke Paintpot which I have and so I don't need this Shadestick.
If Lemon Chiffon looks too much like Bare Study Paint Pot I will pass it too.

The Lipglasses will be mixed together on the lips anyway so I can look, when the first swatches are available, which Lipglasses from those I have looks like them and pass them too.

The MSFs look appealing though. MSFs make me weak.
I-I need every shadestick. I just do, ok?

Quote:
Originally Posted by MAC_Whore View Post
Great, then we will go from the too much MAC category to the too much waistline category.

Here is my high-tech new graphic. Can anyone figure it out?
I frigging love your graphics skills.
Reply
Reply
post #533 of 6040
1/24/09 at 2:11am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

I think Rbella has spread her incontinence issues throughout the forum. Members everywhere seem to be peeing their pants a little from excitement. Its getting to be too much!
Reply
Reply
post #534 of 6040
1/24/09 at 2:13am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krasevayadancer View Post
I think Rbella has spread her incontinence issues throughout the forum. Members everywhere seem to be peeing their pants a little from excitement. Its getting to be too much!
You know, you can't pee your pants if you don't wear any.
Reply
Reply
post #535 of 6040
1/24/09 at 2:35am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by AudreyNicole View Post
WOW! I want one of the MSFs (the bottom one, it looks coral and peachy, that's perfect, the other one is whatever. And I want the shadesticks!

And definitely will skip the lipglass, they look so messy... drive me crazy!
Reply
Reply
post #536 of 6040
1/24/09 at 2:44am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

I just had a stroke of genius...

For all of you who are naughty and boob obsessed, (that would be Moxy and co)

A Mac collection full of sexual innuendos.

We could promote melon pigment. Oh! How about tit for tat eyeshadow (somehow I see this as being a shade of yellow)

With names like squeeze me, lickable, and 100 strokes mac does well on coming up with sexual names huh?
Reply
Reply
post #537 of 6040
1/24/09 at 2:49am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krasevayadancer View Post
I just had a stroke of genius...

For all of you who are naughty and boob obsessed, (that would be Moxy and co)

A Mac collection full of sexual innuendos.

We could promote melon pigment. Oh! How about tit for tat eyeshadow (somehow I see this as being a shade of yellow)

With names like squeeze me, lickable, and 100 strokes mac does well on coming up with sexual names huh?
ooh,let's not forget stroke of lust lipstick from Lure
Reply
Reply
post #538 of 6040
1/24/09 at 3:04am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

The MSFs look yummy, especially the top one! As for the tri colour lipgloss I think I will hold off getting them. Maybe it is because I already own one like it so it doesn't WOW me that much. We'll see.
Reply
Reply
post #539 of 6040
1/24/09 at 3:13am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Quote:
Originally Posted by Krasevayadancer View Post
I just had a stroke of genius...

For all of you who are naughty and boob obsessed, (that would be Moxy and co)

A Mac collection full of sexual innuendos.

We could promote melon pigment. Oh! How about tit for tat eyeshadow (somehow I see this as being a shade of yellow)

With names like squeeze me, lickable, and 100 strokes mac does well on coming up with sexual names huh?
A few from the past:

Succulent,Oh Baby,Nymphette and Desire lipglasses
Tempting,Steamy,Sweet Lust e/s
Satiate ,Shag l/s
Stripdown lip pencil
Reply
Reply
post #540 of 6040
1/24/09 at 3:14am

Re: MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion

Well my shopping list is ready. I'll have to get both MSFs, 3 shadesticks, that pretty red lipstick, and I have to try one of the lipglasses. Although I haven't mastered shadesticks yet, those look just two pretty to pass up.
Reply
Reply
New Posts  All Forums:Forum Nav:
  Return Home
  Back to Forum: Color Collections
Specktra.net MAC Makeup › Welcome to Specktra Community! › MAC Chat › Color Collections › MAC - Sugar Sweet Discussion