Ahoyitslivvy
Well-known member
Dang, it got a bad grade
MAC Quite Cute Discussion
- Thread starter Susanne
- Start date
littlelamb
Well-known member
Dang, it got a bad grade
I know. I was excited for Moshi Moshi more than the other colors but now it looks like I'll skip it.
Ahoyitslivvy
Well-known member
I'm still so tempted to buy it though..maybe I can just put it over a base and the colors will show up better!
Pinkdollface
Well-known member
I read that in the choppingblock, but it's still on the site.
xasperadastra
Well-known member
yep we have swatches!!! probably tomorrow I'll see how lipsticks are on lips^^^^^^
OctoberViolet
Well-known member
Thank you littlelamb! Now, I am bummed. I really wanted the quad, but she gave it a "C" rating. Guess I will hold off and wait for a future
quad that gets a higher rating. Now, I need to see the blushes & lipstick swatches.
quad that gets a higher rating. Now, I need to see the blushes & lipstick swatches.
Pinkdollface
Well-known member
I hoped the quad would be more pigmented. I will try to skip it now, but i'm still tempted to buy it. Maybe it doesn't swatch as bad on my skin
OctoberViolet
Well-known member
You know. I agree w/you Pinkdollface. I am still considering buying it. The colors looks soooo pretty. Augh! Decisions!
I hoped the quad would be more pigmented. I will try to skip it now, but i'm still tempted to buy it. Maybe it doesn't swatch as bad on my skin
well sadly it looks like i might be skipping the quad after all. kinda disapointing pigmentation and also i do feel like the colours are already in my collection somewhere! like the lilac with bad payoff could be crazy cool or beautiful iris (but they have great payoff!) the darker purple looks a little like one of the purples in the spring colour forecast purple quads. not sure on the other two just yet!
Prettypackages
Well-known member
Ok, so I'm skipping the quad, and I thought that I would. I think I will only be getting the lipsticks. That light lavendar looks pretty, but I need to see those swatches.
Ahoyitslivvy
Well-known member
Wow..Miss behave is seriously light. I'm passing on that one...also, in her pic of her wearing miss behave, it looks like she's wearing candy yum yum. Meh, looks dupe-able
littlelamb
Well-known member
Miss Behave is up now as well. This is awful for my work day. I keep stalking Temptalia.
http://www.temptalia.com/mac-miss-behave-mineralize-blush-swatches-photos-review
Maybe the green heart in the center could be used on the eyes like Moshi Moshi (but perhaps better pigmentation?). Just a thought.
http://www.temptalia.com/mac-miss-behave-mineralize-blush-swatches-photos-review
Maybe the green heart in the center could be used on the eyes like Moshi Moshi (but perhaps better pigmentation?). Just a thought.
littlelamb
Well-known member
Quote:
From her post:
"What makeup are you wearing?
MAC Cutie Eyeshadow Quad on eyes, Urban Decay Asphyxia 24/7 Liner on lower lash line, Buxom Lash Mascara, Make Up For Ever HD Foundation, MAC Miss Behave Mineralize Blush on cheeks, MAC Candy Yum-Yum Lipstick on lips."
You're exactly right!Wow..Miss behave is seriously light. I'm passing on that one...also, in her pic of her wearing miss behave, it looks like she's wearing candy yum yum. Meh, looks dupe-able
From her post:
"What makeup are you wearing?
MAC Cutie Eyeshadow Quad on eyes, Urban Decay Asphyxia 24/7 Liner on lower lash line, Buxom Lash Mascara, Make Up For Ever HD Foundation, MAC Miss Behave Mineralize Blush on cheeks, MAC Candy Yum-Yum Lipstick on lips."
LisaOrestea
Well-known member
I actually really like the look of miss behave. I'm quite pale (NC15) so I think it will show a little better on me, but even on Temptalia the colour looks really pretty (in a subtle way).
Still not really interested in the quad. I don't use mac eyeshadows - there are far better options out there
Still not really interested in the quad. I don't use mac eyeshadows - there are far better options out there
Gorgeous
Well-known member
Gorgeous
Well-known member
I'm bummed now.. Perhaps the lippies will be better...
