Dizzy
Well-known member
The Protestor's Side Here
And the Veteran's side
To summarize the link, on March 17, 2007 protesters plan to march from the Vietnam Memorial to the Pentagon in protest of the war. They feel that the Iraq occupation is just a modern version of the Vietnam War, and hence feel it's an appropriate place to start their protest. 'Hanoi' Jane Fonda and Cindy Sheehan are amongst the many participating in the ANSWER-organized protest.
Veterans, on the other hand, are outraged. This is the same group of people who spray painted the steps of the Capitol and spit at a disabled veteran. They are afraid of the protestors desecrating the Wall.
My question is: Should the protestors be allowed to start their march at the Wall?
IMO, if they really wanted to get their point across, there are other places to hold protests. A memorial to Veterans who lost their lives is not the place to do it. To me, this is akin to starting a protest at a cemetary- it's just disrespectful and very low-class.
I think it also adds insult to injury that Jane Fonda is one of the faces of this group. Although ANSWER said that they don't plan on desecrating the wall, I think that the Veteran's fears are valid. They might have a right to protest, but does that mean that they have to do it at a memorial?
Thoughts?
This isn't about anyone's views on the war. This is more about where they want to protest.
And the Veteran's side
To summarize the link, on March 17, 2007 protesters plan to march from the Vietnam Memorial to the Pentagon in protest of the war. They feel that the Iraq occupation is just a modern version of the Vietnam War, and hence feel it's an appropriate place to start their protest. 'Hanoi' Jane Fonda and Cindy Sheehan are amongst the many participating in the ANSWER-organized protest.
Veterans, on the other hand, are outraged. This is the same group of people who spray painted the steps of the Capitol and spit at a disabled veteran. They are afraid of the protestors desecrating the Wall.
My question is: Should the protestors be allowed to start their march at the Wall?
IMO, if they really wanted to get their point across, there are other places to hold protests. A memorial to Veterans who lost their lives is not the place to do it. To me, this is akin to starting a protest at a cemetary- it's just disrespectful and very low-class.
I think it also adds insult to injury that Jane Fonda is one of the faces of this group. Although ANSWER said that they don't plan on desecrating the wall, I think that the Veteran's fears are valid. They might have a right to protest, but does that mean that they have to do it at a memorial?
Thoughts?
This isn't about anyone's views on the war. This is more about where they want to protest.