MAC - In the Groove Discussion
- Thread starter Susanne
- Start date
Karen_B
Well-known member
Quote:
I personally like Petticoat - it isn't my absolute favourite MSF, but it is very pretty. You can apply just the light pink parts to get nice highlight, or the bronze/raspberry parts to get a deeper colour. Some people seem to find it too metallic, but it's nothing that's bothered me.
Originally Posted by Gonzajuju
So apparently I need Stereo Rose. What about Petticoat? Is it that fabulous? |
I personally like Petticoat - it isn't my absolute favourite MSF, but it is very pretty. You can apply just the light pink parts to get nice highlight, or the bronze/raspberry parts to get a deeper colour. Some people seem to find it too metallic, but it's nothing that's bothered me.
Susanne
Well-known member
Quote:
| Originally Posted by Karen_B
I personally like Petticoat - it isn't my absolute favourite MSF, but it is very pretty. You can apply just the light pink parts to get nice highlight, or the bronze/raspberry parts to get a deeper colour. Some people seem to find it too metallic, but it's nothing that's bothered me. |
Sophia84
Well-known member
Petticoat looks great on top of any pink blush, the only problem is that i never wear pink blushes
. OK maybe once or twice within a year!
I remember when Petticoat was first released with Lingerie collection in 2005, I went to my counter a few days after it was released and it was sold out, ohhhh I was soooo mad!! LOL Because the same thing happened again a few months earlier with Stereo Rose. I considered myself lucky when in 2006 I managed to swap for it, and I was completely dissapointed with it
It was very pigmented but with lots of vein, which I hated. Since then I only wore it 4 times! But I have to say it makes any pink blush looks sexier!!!
I remember when Petticoat was first released with Lingerie collection in 2005, I went to my counter a few days after it was released and it was sold out, ohhhh I was soooo mad!! LOL Because the same thing happened again a few months earlier with Stereo Rose. I considered myself lucky when in 2006 I managed to swap for it, and I was completely dissapointed with it
kiss
Well-known member
The first MSF that I fell in love with was Shimpagne. I loved the mettalicness without glitter of it!My everyday go-to MSF is Lightscapade though as it's very subtle and suits my pale skin. Why can't they release a Lavender MSF allready??? And a bright red one that will give you a natural looking flush?? Its mostly always beige,light pink, bronze...
omgitzstephanie
Well-known member
Quote:
A Lavender MSF would be AMAZING!
| Originally Posted by kiss
The first MSF that I fell in love with was Shimpagne. I loved the mettalicness without glitter of it!My everyday go-to MSF is Lightscapade though as it's very subtle and suits my pale skin. Why can't they release a Lavender MSF allready??? And a bright red one that will give you a natural looking flush?? Its mostly always beige,light pink, bronze... |
A Lavender MSF would be AMAZING!
banana1234
Well-known member
totally, are you listening mac? !!!
Leliforever
Well-known member
someone please help me...or i'll end up buying all for of the msfs .
I'll get petticoat for sure as i think it's good both as a highlight and as a blush.do I need candlelight as well??
and i was going to get comfort cause i think it's a very bronzy msf that would work great as a bronzer ,like u're sun hit .Do I need stereo rose?I mean it looks kind of red to me and I don't think it would serve the purpose I want it for...
I'll get petticoat for sure as i think it's good both as a highlight and as a blush.do I need candlelight as well??
and i was going to get comfort cause i think it's a very bronzy msf that would work great as a bronzer ,like u're sun hit .Do I need stereo rose?I mean it looks kind of red to me and I don't think it would serve the purpose I want it for...
Quote:
petticoat and by candlelight are very different imo. by candlelight is literally just a pinky sheeny glow whereas petticoat is so pigmented it can be worn as a blush in it's own right. i have both and love them for different reasons.
| Originally Posted by Leliforever
someone please help me...or i'll end up buying all for of the msfs . I'll get petticoat for sure as i think it's good both as a highlight and as a blush.do I need candlelight as well?? and i was going to get comfort cause i think it's a very bronzy msf that would work great as a bronzer ,like u're sun hit .Do I need stereo rose?I mean it looks kind of red to me and I don't think it would serve the purpose I want it for...
|
petticoat and by candlelight are very different imo. by candlelight is literally just a pinky sheeny glow whereas petticoat is so pigmented it can be worn as a blush in it's own right. i have both and love them for different reasons.
I found out today that the new mineral eye shadow trios are definitely a different formula that includes more of a matte shade and a satin shade. Not the glitter bombs of the recent past. If that's the case, I'm going to be sucked into the vortex!
Between those, Stereo Rose, and a couple of the cremesheens, my wallet will be screaming.
Oh, and the Chillen (blue) cremesheen gloss color is supposedly gorgeous on. I used to have a Prescriptives limited edition gloss that was blue, and it gave the most beautiful finish and color to either bare lips or over lipstick. I think this will be on my list too!
Between those, Stereo Rose, and a couple of the cremesheens, my wallet will be screaming.
Oh, and the Chillen (blue) cremesheen gloss color is supposedly gorgeous on. I used to have a Prescriptives limited edition gloss that was blue, and it gave the most beautiful finish and color to either bare lips or over lipstick. I think this will be on my list too!
GlamQueen21
Well-known member
I wore Cheeky Bronze MSF lightly on my cheeks over Eversun bpb. Gorgeous combo! I cannot wait to get four Stereo Rose MSFs when this collection comes out.
Quote:
ooohhh that is interesting. although i still can't help but think i already have enough mes!
| Originally Posted by Shypo
I found out today that the new mineral eye shadow trios are definitely a different formula that includes more of a matte shade and a satin shade. Not the glitter bombs of the recent past. If that's the case, I'm going to be sucked into the vortex!
|
ooohhh that is interesting. although i still can't help but think i already have enough mes!
