Quote:
Originally Posted by lah_knee
hell no i wouldnt pay over retail for pleasureflush. its so plain and boring. ITS JUST SHIMMER. thats the way i look at it. and mac releases so many shimmery products that all of it gets old and starts to look similar. lucia has it and says its ugly. she only keeps it because she wants to sell it one day because so many people overpay for it lol
im not a fan of msf's anyway. i think i might stand alone but i dont care. im not too keen on shimmery products for the cheeks
|
you don't stand alone! I only have one MSF- Lightscapade (and a backup) because it's not a glitterbomb like the others I've tried. I would like Stereo Rose, because it looks like a pretty, unique blush color, but other than that, I haven't been impressed with MSFs- too glittery, not enough color, etc. I really prefer the Laura Geller Baked Blushes- same concept, no GLITTER. Just a glowiness on the cheeks, and the pigmentation is great. If MAC could make their MSFs like that, I'd be all over them, but until then, I don't get the hype.
However, those pigments will be MINE, and I'm praying there are some new fluidlines in these collections that we just haven't heard about yet.